When parents remain married, they can choose whether and to what extent they will contribute towards their children’s college expenses, without the involvement of the state. However, if the child was born out of wedlock, or the parents divorce before the child is emancipated, in many situations, a parent can be forced to contribute.
Actually, the states are all over the map on this issue. In Indiana, such a parent can be ordered to pay a share of college expenses. Generally speaking, 21 states will impose responsibility for college expenses, while 29 state will not. (Source: NCSL). However, the specific provision vary widely from state to state and are not subject to easy summary (some states have absolute cut off ages, like 21 or 23, others like Indiana permit expenses for college to continue, even after the child reached the age where regular child support is terminated).
Indiana’s statute on the issue (IC 31-16-6-2) is frustratingly vauge, leaving the appeals courts to rule that the determination is left largely to the discretion of the trial courts. Trial courts are all over the map in Indiana on this issue: Some courts limit costs to what an in-state university would charge, while others will impose orders beyond this. Some courts will include expense items like clothing, car insurance, and even pizza money.
In Indiana, regular child support terminates at age 21, regardless, but coverage for college expenses can continue beyond this. As a child may be in college until age 22 or even 23, what “educational” expenses are included after age 21? Room and board? Transportation? Medical insurance and expenses? Again, the Indiana provision is surprisingly unhelpful. In most cases I encounter, the parents work together to come up with an agreement to resolve parental responsibility for these costs, but in some, particularly where the relationship between a parent and the child has become attenuated, litigation is required.
Many parents under a college expense order, are frustrated by the lack of control: The child is making choices in their lives that the parent does not agree with, and the parent is deprived of the standard parental response: threaten to close the wallet.
A recent case from the Indiana Court of Appeals:
Snow next contends that the trial court erred in not defining the terms “school expenses” and “college expenses” in its order. Specifically, he argues that his obligation should not be calculated to include certain expenses, such as car payments, parking, car insurance, gasoline, license plates, utilities, clothing, and a cell phone.
We note that the trial court has discretion to determine what is included in educational expenses
What to take from this? If you want to maintain control over this issue, you might want to consider moving to Kentucky, Ohio or Michigan before you get divorced. . . .