-
we find no merit to Dixon’s argument that the length of his sentence was inappropriate because he did not physically harm his victims
-
If able to show that he did not receive notice of the unemployment hearing, he was not afforded due process on his underlying substantive claim
-
the trial court had no statutory authority to award J.D. time-served credit
-
Daugherty’s potential claim was barred as a matter of law by his failure to give notice within 180 days of the occurrence
This entry was posted
on Friday, April 29th, 2005 at 3:18 pm and is filed under Uncategorized.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Both comments and pings are currently closed.
