-
Lowery further contends that he should not be held strictly liable for behavior of another adult whom he could not control, and that the Housing Authority management defined criminal activity too expansively.
-
Trial court held hospital in contempt and jailed 2 administrators for refusing to take an involuntary commitment. Court reverses: hospital does not have to accept, and contempt process not proper.
-
No indication in record that more than 1 copy of joint summons delivered and sent to residence. Single summons addressed to “Charles and Connie Allburn” was insufficient to provide notice of pending forfeiture action
-
Trial court admits out of court statement made by person not willing to testify under Evidence Rule 801(d)(2)(B). Error found, murder conviction reversed.
-
Barker does not present any showing that the framers and ratifiers of the Indiana Constitution intended Section 19 to guarantee a jury determination of facts and law with respect to sentencing factors.
-
Implicit in this finding of total disability is the premise that, even if Dial-X did offer Caskey work on April 3, his medical condition was one of total disability, and he could not have performed such work.
This entry was posted
on Wednesday, May 4th, 2005 at 5:18 pm and is filed under Uncategorized.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Both comments and pings are currently closed.
