<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No goal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kemplog.com/2005/07/22/no-goal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kemplog.com/2005/07/22/no-goal/</link>
	<description>Life and law in Eastern Indiana</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 04:33:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://www.kemplog.com/2005/07/22/no-goal/#comment-107</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-107</guid>
		<description>The cap is being raised under IC 34-13-3-4. For causes of action accruing after 1/1/06 the cap is $500,000. And accruing after 1/1/08 it's $700,000. 

Any idea why Ball State settled for $300k? Seems like that's the worst they could do - so they might as well try it in an effort to knock the amount down some. Also, since it's a governmental entity, contributory negligence is a defense; comparative negligence wouldn't apply. Intentionally pulling the goal posts down would seem to qualify as contributory negligence. 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The cap is being raised under IC 34-13-3-4. For causes of action accruing after 1/1/06 the cap is $500,000. And accruing after 1/1/08 it&#8217;s $700,000. </p>
<p>Any idea why Ball State settled for $300k? Seems like that&#8217;s the worst they could do - so they might as well try it in an effort to knock the amount down some. Also, since it&#8217;s a governmental entity, contributory negligence is a defense; comparative negligence wouldn&#8217;t apply. Intentionally pulling the goal posts down would seem to qualify as contributory negligence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
