home

Archive for November, 2005

Pig Death

Monday, November 28th, 2005

Natural Pork Production II, the Harlan, Iowa farming group who was granted a special exception for a CAFO to contain 11,200 sows in Wayne County, recently suffered yet another a setback in their home state:

BRAYTON, Iowa State natural resources officials say as many as a thousand pigs may have been destroyed by a fire at a hog confinement building in southwest Iowa.

Fire officials say an automatic fire alarm sounded at the Natural Pork Production building located two miles west of Brayton at about 3 a.m. today.

Firefighters from Brayton and neighboring counties fought the flames for 4 1/2 hours before getting the fire under control.

The wood-framed metal building was built in 2002. It is one of five hog production facilities in Iowa that houses as many as five thousand sows.

The spread of manure

Wednesday, November 23rd, 2005

Yesterday I discussed the proposed Wayne County CFO regulations, which focus on setback requirements, water quality issues, and the spaying versus injecting of manure.  It got me wondering about the prospect of spreading/injecting manure around the county, and whether anyone has looked into the potential risks involved.
 
Well, of course, someone has.  For instance,  check out this actricle ($10.00 purchase) by researchers from the University of Minnesota in the Journal of Environmental Quality from this month.  Abstract:
Antibiotics are commonly added to animal feed as supplements to promote growth of food animals. However, absorption of antibiotics in the animal gut is not complete and as a result substantial amounts of antibiotics are excreted in urine and feces that end up in manure. Manure is used worldwide not only as a source of plant nutrients but also as a source of organic matter to improve soil quality especially in organic and sustainable agriculture. Greenhouse studies were conducted to determine whether or not plants grown in manure-applied soil absorb antibiotics present in manure. The test crops were corn (Zea mays L.), green onion (Allium cepa L.), and cabbage (Brassica oleracea L. Capitata group). All three crops absorbed chlortetracycline but not tylosin. The concentrations of chlortetracycline in plant tissues were small (2–17 ng g–1 fresh weight), but these concentrations increased with increasing amount of antibiotics present in the manure. This study points out the potential human health risks associated with consumption of fresh vegetables grown in soil amended with antibiotic laden manures. The risks may be higher for people who are allergic to antibiotics and there is also the possibility of enhanced antimicrobial resistance as a result of human consumption of these vegetables.

So, at least for me, there is a new question to ask at the local farmer’s market.

Ball Money

Wednesday, November 23rd, 2005

Yesterday, I discussed the Dale Davis paternity child support case, here. Well, thanks to an anonymous source, I have been clued into who it is that Mr. Davis is doing battle with in this support case, and I yielded to the temptation to post a little dirt.
 
You probably knew, but for me, tending to be clueless on things pop culture,  reading the name of the mother in Re: Paternity of T.X.J. meant nothing.  But Karla Kay Knafel, is a name that has been in the news and in the courts in the past over disputes with a famous basketball player, in fact, “the” famous basketball player.
 
She had previously set her sights on Michael Jordan, who alleged that, after an affair with her, he paid her a quarter of a million dollars to go away and hush, only to have to sue her when he claimed she came back for more: Jordan v. Knafel.  Jordan’s action basically accused her of extortion. She fired back with a countersuit, over here, seeking $5 million for breach of contract. Basically, she claimed that Jordan had agreed to pay her 5 million to keep her from going public with their affair and he did not pay (Jordan’s suit only sought a declaration that the contract claim was unenforceable).
 
The trial court, reasonably enough, threw both actions out, but back in February of this year, that Illinois court of appeals reversed and sent the mess back to Cook County Circuit Court: Jordan v. Knafel, appeal (823 N.E.2d 1113, trans. denied, 833 N.E.2d 3). Where it goes (or went) is beyond my knowledge (and interest).
 
 

Shideler AG Park a Go

Tuesday, November 22nd, 2005

Nearly 100 Shideler residents turned up for the hearing that determined the rezoning for an 806-acre agricultural bio-enterprise park. Delaware County Commissioners Larry Crouch and Tom Bennington approved the rezoning, while Commissioner John Brooke made a motion to delay voting. Brooke did not want to vote on the issue until “adequate ag-park regulations” were passed by commissioners.
 

Dale’s son deserves to live in a million dollar home

Tuesday, November 22nd, 2005

Well, that is at least what the boy’s mother believes. In Re: Paternity of T.X.J., The Court of Appeals takes on the mother’s request to raise the support obligation of Dale Davis, an Indiana Pacer. The title of this post is actually what the mother told the trial court in her bid.

The Court of appeals ultimately rejects the bid (reversing the trial court that had almost triple Dale’s support), but not before authoring this jewel:

At this point, the argument seems like a slam dunk for Davis. But Knafel attempts a block by pointing out that MacLafferty is distinguishable on its facts.

Ouch.

Proposed Wayne County CFO Regs and a call for others

Tuesday, November 22nd, 2005

In the comments to this post, Bob Sexton, one of the folks fighting a pig CAFO down in Jackson County, asked for a pointer to an online version of the proposed Wayne County CFO regulations. I looked around and could not find one, so I went down to the local planning office and the director was helpful and gave me a copy.

This is the current version, the one that has already incorporated changes requested by the county commissioners, and the version that will be re-presented to the commissioners for consideration (i.e. Adoption). Note the changes are indicated by underlines (additions) and strikethroughs (deletions): Proposed Wayne County Regulations.

My $.02? The proposed regs only deal with potential groundwater contamination, specifying required setbacks from water wells and residences. The changes in the regulations reduce the setback requirements when manure is to be injected into the ground as opposed to sprayed. There is nothing in the proposed regs to deal with the air quality issues, nor the humane treatment of animals issues.

My question: Does anyone have a bead on other local CFO/CAFO regulations? Have any local counties dealt with either the air quality issues or the humane issues?

Look over here for more info on Jackson County’s struggle.

Blackford Co. & AG Director Make Up

Tuesday, November 22nd, 2005

Andrew Miller, the director of Indiana State Department of Agriculture, showed up in Blackford County at a county commissioners meeting in an attempt to “mend fences” (read: repair publicity gaff).  Remember that Mr. Miller released a nasty note after Blackford rejected a CAFO special use permit, implying that the county was anti-agriculture. See: kemplog: Pressure.

After the meeting, [county commissioner] Walker said he hoped that Miller “understands where we’re coming from, that he knows we are not opposed to CAFOs in this county. But we have issues on locations of those CAFOs.

“The commissioners have been very supportive of agriculture in the past and will continue to be in the future. But we realize that issues will come up in the future that have to be addressed with discussion from both sides.”

 
What is interesting to me here is that there is no resolution or progress on the issue: the Ag director is still preaching pork, pork and more pork, and the commissioners (note, they are all farmers) are still expressing concerns about controlling the growth of confined feeding operations.
 

Cash Cow

Saturday, November 19th, 2005

While I am on the subject of confined feeding operations, be sure to check out the New York Times piece, Organic Cash Cow, that came out this past Wednesday.  In the piece, Kim Severson notes that, under current USDA guidelines, milk grown in under what are essentially confinement type conditions can be marketed as “organic,” thanks primarily to the lobbying done by the big dairies (who now occupy the majority of the organic milk market, think Horizon).
 
Through the article, I learned of the  Cornucopia Institute of Wisconsin, which is a non-profit devoted to maintaining traditional “organic” standards under USDA enforcement of federal organic standards:

Organic food has become a very big business, with a 20 percent annual growth rate in sales in recent years. But popularity has come at a price. Ever since 2002, when the Department of Agriculture began its program of national organic certification, there has been a steady lobbying effort to weaken standards in a way that makes it easier for the giant food companies, which often use synthetic substances in processing, to enter the organic market.

That’s exactly why many organic farmers greeted the U.S.D.A.’s organic seal with real trepidation. They know that the one thing the department has always done especially well is to capitulate to the lobbying pressure of big food and big agriculture.

Check out the difference between 2 “organic” farms:
 
 

CAFO Saturday

Saturday, November 19th, 2005

Well, the first item does not deal with CAFO’s, but their smaller cousins CFO’s.  The Wayne County Plan Commission has recomended that the county commissioners pass the newly drafted CFO regulations: Commission recommends approval of CFO ordinance - Palladium-Item. If the commissioners sign off on the new ordinance, any newly proposed CFO would have to comply.
 
I was talking to my wife this morning about a friend who lives nearby in the country.  When this friend first went out to rural Randolph county, built her dream home, and settled in with her kids roaming the countryside unhindered and unthreatened, we were very jeleous. We live in the “suburbs” of Richmond in a very nice neighborhood, but not at all the county setting the we had always dreamed of, and had lived in until I started working as an attorney.
 
Now, though, we do not envy this friend quite so much.  She has had to fight (an lose) the placement of a landfill near her homestead, fight (and lose) against the placement of a super-dairy (read CAFO) nearby, and now she is facing the installation of a pig CAFO in the neighborhood. 
 
What was once an ideal setting in traditional Indiana landscapes, is turning into a an industrial ghetto. But this is the transformation we in rural Indiana are being asked to accept.  It will be here before we know it.
 
Take for instance Karen Myers’s observations yesterday on her blog: Karen is the author of the “Work at Home Mom Diary” or wahm diary.  She lives in Wheatfield, Indiana, although she is originally Canadian.  She reports on what appears to be the first sighting of whooping cranes in northern Indiana for the year.  The cranes pass through each year around this time, providing locals and bird tourists with an opportunity to catch a view.
 
Karen noted that John Kendall saw 4 whooping cranes yesterday morning on the Jasper-Pulaski Fish & Wildlife Reserve, but goes on to note that the Reserve is under 3 miles from a pig CAFO that was approved by Jasper County earlier this month:
Imagine it - the excavation construction is only about 30 yards from the border of the Jasper/Pulaski Fish & Wildlife Area game reserve …only about 3 miles from the center of the reserve’s major fresh water lake/pond into which most all the surrounding tributaries and ditches feed.
Be sure to check out Karen’s report from the Jasper Co BZA meeting, here. She focus on one of the issue that concern me the most about confined feeding: the basic cruelty inflicted on the livestock.
 
 

Conner Prairie: the Future

Friday, November 18th, 2005

The State AG has announced the composition of the new Conner Prairie board of directors according to this story running on  Inside Indiana Business:
 
The appointees are:

Stan Hurt, Chairman, Arts Council of Indianapolis, appointed by Governor Mitch Daniels

Douglas D. Church, Managing Partner, Church, Church, Hittle & Antrim, appointed by Chief Justice Randall T. Shepard

Judge Sarah Evans Barker, United States District Court, Southern District of Indiana, appointed by Attorney General Steve Carter

Dr. Bobby Fong, President, Butler University, appointed by Attorney General Steve Carter

Berkley Duck, Chairman, Save the Prairie, Inc., appointed by Hamilton County Circuit Court Judge Judith S. Proffitt

Judge Thomas G. Fisher, Indiana Tax Court , appointed by Earlham College Board of Trustees Chairman Mark Myers

Morris Mills, Earlham College Board of Trustees, appointed by Earlham College Board of Trustees Chairman Mark Myers

The Foundation is one of the two new nonprofit boards established by the Conner Prairie Agreement reached last July between the Attorney General and Earlham College. Hamilton Superior Court Judge William Hughes approved the agreement in September.

The Attorney General is asking Judge Barker to lead the Foundation in its first organizational meeting. Carter is also asking board members to begin their work immediately with a first priority to appoint the initial members of the Museum Board.

The Conner Prairie Foundation Board will be responsible for managing the endowment assets, while the Conner Prairie Museum Board will be responsible for operating the museum.

The Museum Board of Directors would consist of eleven members selected by the Board of the Foundation. At least one Director would be selected from nominees made by each of the following organizations and officeholders:

· The Hamilton County Board of Commissioners

· The Mayor of Carmel

· The Town Council of Fishers

· The Governor of the State of Indiana

· The Mayor of Indianapolis

· The Board of the Indianapolis Convention and Visitors Association

· The Board of the Hamilton County Convention and Visitors Bureau

· The Conner Prairie Alliance; and

· Earlham College (this is a direct appointment)

The Board of the Foundation would select two of its members to fill the remaining two directorships.
(Thanks to Marcia Oddi (http://www.indianalawblog.com/) for the link)

What will happen to my stuff in a divorce

Friday, November 18th, 2005

The Indiana Court of Appeals issued a decision yesterday dealing with several key divorce issues, including the division of property. 
 
Like most states, Indiana has “no-fault” divorce, meaning that either spouse can bring an end to the marriage, effectively on request, without having to prove that something is wrong in the marriage.
 
What this means for actual people getting divorced in Indiana can be confusing. If you have no kids and no assets, your divorce will be simple.  If you have minor kids, then the divorce order must deal with the care and support of them.  If you have assets, then the divorce order should fairly divide them.  I say “should” because sometimes people do not do a good job of presenting the facts to the court to permit the court to make a fair determination.
 
Mark Balicki v. Darcy Balicki is a decision that focuses on the evidence that must be provided to the trial court when the parties to a marriage own an interest in a small business.  From personal experience, I tell you that small businesses can create very complicated divorces. The key problem is that many small businesses have no real value, beyond that of the people involved.  In business appraisals, we call that concept “personal goodwill” and differentiate it from “enterprise goodwill.”  Personal goodwill in a business is really just a measure of future earnings capacity of the owner, and is not, under Indiana law, considered to be an asset subject to division in a divorce.
 
Enterprise goodwill, on the other hand, is something that exists in the business today (i.e. if you sold it to a third party, they would get the benefit of it), and is subject to division in a divorce.  In this case, Mark claimed that the trial court erred in valuing an interest in a small business, claiming that the trial court included personal goodwill in selecting a higher valuation of the business.  Trouble the Court found here was that, despite the fact that there were no fewer that 3 valuations of this particular business submitted to the trial court, none of them addressed the value of the personal goodwill.  Without coverage of that issue in the evidence, the Court of Appeals could not review the claim of error
 
The lesson here is pretty clear, but this is not the first time this issue has come up, so the question becomes, why did these parties pay for 3 separate business appraisals (they are pretty expensive), but not have the appraiser calculate a value for personal goodwill?
 
Indiana’s no-fault divorce scheme does not include the concept of alimony, but there is a provision for spousal maintenance which authorized an order for one spouse to contribute to support the other after the divorce. The circumstances in which this type of an order can issue are very limited, and it is not something that we see very often.  In the Balicki case, the issue comes up because the parties have an adult child who is severely disabled, and requires ongoing care.  This case covers what a party must show to get an award of “caregiver maintenance,” an order to support a former spouse who is caring for a disabled child.

Maybe Lawyers Just Don’t Like Doctor’s

Wednesday, November 16th, 2005

The Indiana Court of Appeals released an opinion on Monday that has many of us in the domestic relations bar (i.e. Attorneys who handle family law matters) a little shocked.  The case,  Edwin Eppler v. Jane Eppler, gives fairly broad discretion to the trial court to impose child support obligation above what normally be imposed based on current earnings of the parties.
 
I’m sure that Doctor Eppler may wonder at this point is attorneys just have it in for those in the medical field, but the case, like all cases, turns on more technical issues in the child support field.
 
What concerned me in the case was the court’s affirmation of the trial court’s use of the good doctor’s pre-filing income to set his child support. When the divorce was filed, the doctor reduced the number of shifts he worked, and  thereby reduced his income.  While acknowledging that the child support rules cannot be used to force a parent to work to their full potential, the Court determined that the reduction in income after filing of the divorce was a “voluntary reduction” under the support guidelines, and pre-filing income would be used.
 
The Court does not say it, but it is clear that the purpose of attributing to the good doctor his prior higher earnings was to prevent parents from intentionally reducing their incomes in a divorce to avoid the payment of child support.
 
My problem with this position is that it fails to acknowledge the changes that occur in regular family life during a separation and divorce. Parents who used to live together and pool parental reasources are suddenly trying to raise kids in 2 separate households.  In my experience, this frequently causes parents to alter their works schedules, to be more available to parent their kids.
 
I guess it comes down to presumed intentions: A parent makes the choice to spend more time with their kids and less time at work in response to the breakup of their marriage and the courts presume the intention is to reduce child support.  Having watched several families struggle with the changes that divorce brings, I would not be so quick to presume a financial motivation.   Others may disagree.
 
Another part of this case that I do not like was the Court’s determination of the doctor’s complaint that he should have been permitted to claim the kids on his taxes. The Court said that is an issue to be determined, but, “[t]he noncustodial parent must demonstrate the tax consequences to each parent as a result of transferring the exemption and how such transfer would benefit the children.” 
 
Since the doctor submitted no proof, the Court could not determine any error.  I think this is a sound determination, but, from a personal perspective, I hate preparing tax returns, and being responsible to prep 1 for each party in a child support fight is no fun.
 
 

Ag Plans

Tuesday, November 15th, 2005

One part of the Indiana ag parks (in addition to focusing on CAFO’s) is the installation of ethanol plants.
 
Many politicians go on record blindly embracing ethanol as some type of panacea for both the energy crisis and rural poverty.  It is nice to see a representative who takes a more balanced approach:
Ethanol is not a catch-all solution to our energy problems. It is just one of the many innovative alternative fuels being developed today that will evolve over time.

Budget Woes Crimp Police Work

Tuesday, November 15th, 2005

Interstate drug interdiction is a developing field for rural police forces.  We all know that the interstates are used to carry drugs around the country.  Cops in rural jurisdictions with interstates running through them have developed a game of fishing for the big fish in those interstate streams.
 
Locally, the Richmond Police Force had a special taskforce with officers assigned to near full-time duty up on the interstate.  This came about after the county to our east,  over in Ohio, kept busting big time drug shipments on I-70, presumably just after these drug movers went through our county.
 
The upside for the officers doing the busts includes competition with other jurisdictions up and down the interstate, plus, success is actually pretty difficult, so the work involves skill and accomplishment.  You have to be able to figure out who is carrying drugs (you can’t just stop everyone), come up with a way to legally stop the suspected drug transporter, and then come up with a way to legally search their vehicle.
 
But the activity is not universally loved by government decision makers (or citizens).  The reality is that the drug transporters are not bound for Richmond, they are headed to some distant big city.  They are, to put it simply, not our problem, so why should we pay our tax dollars to put officers out there? That issue could be solved by the federal government paying for the patrols to spread the cost out on a national level.
 
But even then, the benefit to the local community in pulling in additional criminal defendants is questionable.  Each arrest means another felony case for the prosecutor, judge, and public defender.  It also typically means local funds going towards pre-trial detention and some work for the probation officer. In short, the entire justice system is burdened by importing this stream of criminals.
 
Recently, shortfalls in the Richmond budget have lead to the axing of the taskforce after a 1 year trial.  The police, though, would like to see the program continue:
 
 

(Near) Daily CAFO Update

Tuesday, November 15th, 2005

Well, the Jasper County pig farm is moving along.  The Board of Zoning Appeals approved a special exception permit Monday by a vote of 4-1. But, some locals are not giving up:
Angry residents were fighting the proposed farm of 2,496 hogs because they say the operation could lead to air, water and land contamination.

Residents, who collected nearly 1,000 signatures in about 10 days, protested the plans by DeMotte-based Belstra Milling Co.
In the interests of keeping track of who is who:
The Belstra Group includes the feed mill in DeMotte, five Pig Improvement Co. gilt multipliers made up of 7,000 sows in Northwest Indiana and the 160-head boar stud operation in Kankakee County, Ill.
The thing about the CAFO fights is that it is not your standard urban versus rural neighbor dispute, where urban sprawl foist suburban lifestyles into the country, causing a clash in land use.  No, the CAFO dispute is about a fundamental revamping of rural land use across Indiana, turning our idyllic “amber waves of grain” and old farmsteads into massive factory farms sporting cesspools and carcass mounds. 
 
The folks who are complaining are often long-term rural residents who do not like what they see:
Roy and Bonnie Reese said they live within a mile of the operation and understand hog farming.

“There could be water contamination from the spreading of waste, odors from the buildings,” Roy Reese said. “I’m afraid with an operation that size, the water could be depleted. We have a rental house next door, and we can’t rent that because we don’t have enough water.”

Bonnie Reese said they are not against hog farmers because many of them have raised hogs at some point.

“We are against these big corporations coming in and taking over and destroying our water, soil and air,” she said.
 
In other pig news, Terry Fleck, the executive director of the Indiana Pork Producers Association (IPPA) for the last 16 years, is leaving.  The IPPA can rightfully claim to have played a big part in forming the current governor’s plans for the future of pork  production in Indiana.
 

Federal funding for CAFO water quality

Monday, November 14th, 2005

I do not know how the USDA doles out its money, but here is a bit of news for California CAFO’s: $10 million in subsidies to promote the implementation of water quality measures:
To protect water quality there are a number of conservation practices producers can use to safely store and treat manure and apply it to land at rates that provide crop nutrients without harming groundwater. The Natural Resources Conservation Service will share the cost of many of these practices through the initiative, with the producer and the agency each paying half.
 
Some of these practices include manure storage; manure treatment such as composting and other forms of digestion; manure transfer; storm water control features such as berms and diversions; nutrient management; irrigation practices; and land treatments such as manure runoff control.
 
 
 

Arboretum update: lawsuit progress

Monday, November 14th, 2005

Well, the trees are gone, all that is left is the pushed around mud of a future large scale construction site, but the fighting created when the city of Richmond permitted Hayes Arboretum to get 33 acres rezone for commercial development continues in the courts. Some quotes:
After arguments that lasted about two hours, Superior Court I Judge P. Thomas Snow pledged to work “with all deliberate speed” to resolve the case. 

The two sides argued the points of the case, including the neighbors’ claim that the city plan commission improperly used the planned unit development (PUD) ordinance for rezoning the land and that the plan commission failed to properly address or vote on nine findings of fact as required by the PUD ordinance.

They also argued that the neighbors’ property values would suffer because of additional traffic, light and noise from the development.

 
 
 
 

Brownstown CAFO Fight is Joined

Thursday, November 10th, 2005

The Jackson County Tribune has a story out today from the Jackson county pig farm approval, a meeting that drew out 200 residents last month, including a very vocal opposition:
 
Jennings Water Inc. filed a petition to reverse the approval of an 8,000-head hog operation approved by the Jackson County Board of Zoning Appeals in October.

The petition for a writ of certiorari, filed Tuesday on behalf of the company by Columbus attorney Pete King, calls for Jackson Circuit Court to reverse the BZA’s approval of Talara Lykins’ request for a special exception. It also accuses the BZA of violating Indiana Open Door Law during the Oct. 11 meeting at the Vallonia gymnasium, saying members held an “illegal executive session.”

Robert Sexton, a member of Families Against (CAFO) in Reddington, a collection of residents opposed to Lykins’ operation, filed a petition against the BZA on Wednesday afternoon, according to the Jackson County clerk’s office.
 
 
The article notes that there is a motion to stay construction on the site pending with IDEM, and similar motion my be filed with the Jackson Circuit Court.

Water contamination from CAFO asserted

Thursday, November 10th, 2005

Drinking water wells test high for nitrates, and this causes local government to voice concern over how local dairy operations deal with waste:

Newton County Councilwoman Sharon Miller, former Newton County Commissioner Roxanna Hanford and Newton County resident Carla Orlandi are concerned that nitrates from animal waste applied to soil could contaminate northern Newton County’s drinking water.

“Your health is at risk because your drinking water is at risk,” Orlandi said. “Even with the best management practices, studies have shown that it is a very real potential that the manure being land-applied will leach.”

Orlandi said cows at Fair Oaks Dairy Farm, in rural Newton County, excrete more than a million pounds of manure a day.

“We’re not against the dairy or any confined animal feeding operation,” Orlandi said.

Orlandi has taken up a fight against the local dairy which is already the largest East of the Mississippi and wants to get bigger:

IDEM issued a general permit which Orlandi is fighting. She says IDEM should issue an individual permit, which allows the permit to be site-specific and calls for a public hearing. An individual permit could also allow IDEM to take into account the sandy soil in northern Newton County.

According to Steve Jann of the EPA, there is a risk that the sandy soil could allow nitrates to leach into ground water. He said the best way to control that problem is by only allowing nitrogen to be applied to plants growing in the farm field.

Link to Post-Tribune article:  Nitrates exceed limit in well test
 
 
 
 

New CAFO in the works

Wednesday, November 9th, 2005

Same old story, but in a new place:
 
A proposed confined animal feeding operation in Owen Township cleared its final hurdle Tuesday night during a Jackson County Board of Zoning Appeals meeting.

That approval, however, for a request from Tom and Linda Hallow for a special exception for the 8,000-head operation on County Road 100S, west of County Road 50W, didn’t come without opposition.

Jim Davers, president of the Medora Town Council, for instance, said he had some concerns about how the operation might affect the town’s water supply.

“We want you to take a good, hard look at this,” Davers said.

Davers’ concerns focused on the potential for floodwaters crossing ground where manure from the Hallows’ hog operation might be spread. He said those same floodwaters flow near wells that supply drinking water for about 400 customers in the town.
 
 
 

  • Photos

    Spring has sprung at home (iPhoneSlide)

    Last meal on the trip (iPhoneSlide)

    Bathroom break #1 (iPhoneSlide)

    More Photos
  • Loading...
  • New Links of Interest