home

Archive for December, 2005

Not Law, but Birds

Saturday, December 31st, 2005

Indiana has many interesting natural regions across the state that are worth exploring and preserving. Earlier this fall I noted that there is a CAFO (my issue for 2005) being installed near a site known for Sandhill Cranes: Jasper County CAFO.
 
Today, the Star takes note of some Indiana sites that are receiving national recognition for bird watching:
The National Audubon Society is paying attention, though, and this fall formally recognized three specific points in Porter County in its first Important Bird Areas program in Indiana.
 
Beverly Shores, Cowles Bog in the Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore and Indiana Dunes State Park are the first and so far only designated IBAs in the region, according to James Cole, Indiana Important Bird Areas coordinator.
 
In Indiana, 13 sites have been identified out of a potential list of more than 100. Porter is the only Indiana county with more than one site.
A Birder’s Place to Perch by Diane Krieger Spivak
 

Nevada Files Against Schwab Foundation

Saturday, December 31st, 2005

The Nevada AG’s office has partnered with the Indiana AG in pursuit of the Schwab Foundation, focusing on the activities of Richard Blaich, an Indiana attorney, and president of the Foundation:

In Wednesday’s filing, the Nevada attorney general asserted that Blaich does indeed reside at the Lake Las Vegas home. The lawsuit alleges that the home’s purchase had “no apparent motive” related to the foundation’s stated purpose of supporting programs that counsel, test and guide children in their career choices.

The lawsuit claims that no rent has been collected on the home. In addition, Blaich has mortgages on two other homes — in Roanoke, Ind., and Ontario, Canada, — while the Lake Las Vegas home was bought with cash. The lawsuit also alleges that the foundation’s administrative and travel expenses increased from 2002 to 2004, even though directors eliminated the philanthropy’s paid staff. The Nevada attorney general’s office will use the spending trends to bolster allegations of financial misappropriation, said Nicole Moon, a spokeswoman with the agency.

Link (Los Vegas Review Journal)
 
The twin lawsuits are summarized as follows:

The Nevada lawsuit, filed in Clark County District Court, asks for removal of the foundation’s officers and directors, dissolution of Schwab’s Nevada entity and civil damages in excess of $10,000.

The Indiana lawsuit, filed in Allen Superior Court in Marion County, Ind., seeks to undo the asset transfer from Schwab’s Indiana corporation to its Nevada base, and to return those assets to a reinstated and reformed Schwab Foundation in Indiana.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Conner Prairie: The Final Act?

Friday, December 30th, 2005

Well it is done:
Conner Prairie, the living history museum in Fishers, and its governing trustee Earlham College today prepared to formally sever relations following a years-long dispute over money and control.
 
A final transfer of assets from Earlham to Conner Prairie was scheduled to take place at a State House ceremony this afternoon.

Drug Busts 101

Friday, December 30th, 2005

The Court of Appeals seems to be taking us back to basics today.  In Jarvis L. Watson, Jr. v. State of Indiana we learn what the term “controlled” means in the phrase “controlled buy.”
 
Basically, when police conduct a purchase of drugs from a suspected dealer, they find a dirtbag, search them, maybe put a transmitter on them, and carefully watch them as they go out and attempt to buy drugs.  The searching the confidential informant (CI) beforehand, and carefully watching them, makes the buy “controlled.” Anything less is not sufficient, as the officers in Watson are learning:

Because the CI was not searched prior to the buy and the CI did not testify about receiving the cocaine from Watson, we must agree with Watson that no reasonable fact_finder, based on this evidence alone, could have found beyond a reasonable doubt he originally possessed the cocaine found on the CI after the buy.

Reversed.
 
 
 
 
 

Heads Up Landlords: Security Deposit Law 101

Friday, December 30th, 2005

Small claims court always gives me the creeps because of the lack of basic rules of evidence (like a bar to hearsay), but I love small claims because the issues are small and simple, so justice tends to be swift and true.
 
Another problem with small claims is they seldom ever get appealed, so as far as decisions go, you do not wee much of them.  Landlord/tenant law is left to the realm of small claims. There are many folks out there who own rentals as an investment, and many of them do not know much about real estate, business nor the law. 
 
Today, the Court of Appeals offers an introductory lesson on Indiana’s Security Deposit Law (IC 32-31-3), throughCathy Durf v. Harold & Doris Molter. So, pay attention:

The landlord must provide a tenant with written notice of the damages within forty_five days of the termination of the rental agreement and delivery of possession. The tenant must provide the landlord with a mailing address in which to deliver this notice. If the landlord fails to comply the tenant is entitled to return of the entire security deposit and reasonable attorney fees. . .The failure to comply with the notice of damages requirement constitutes an agreement by the landlord that no damages are due.

Here, the Landlord sued for possession, got the tenant out, and then went after the damages, but never sent the notice of damages to the tenant.  The trial court gave the landlord the damages anyway, but the Court of Appeals says “no,” no notice = no damages. 
 

AG Moves to Freeze Assets of Schwab Foundation

Thursday, December 29th, 2005

Well, I am officially back in Indiana. I actually got back a couple of days ago, but I have been digging out of a pile of paperwork since then.
 
Back in August, the Fort Wayne Journal Gazette ran this story about the Olin B. and Desta Schwab Foundation, and I posted a piece on it noting:
The foundation had its office in Fort Wayne.  It had a board of directors, staff, ran programs with guidance counselors and gave grants to further its charitable purpose. But since Schwab’s death in 1991, its board had shrunk, its office was moved to the office of a local attorney, Richard Blaich, who Schwab put on the board of directors, and who drew up the governing documents.  The board has been trimmed down.  The staff has been fired. The foundation itself, which started out as an Indiana non-profit, is now a Nevada corporation. And most troubling, the foundation purchased a 1.5 million dollar luxury home in Nevada, and is spending $100K per year to maintain this residence, which is being used by Blaich and his family.
Now comes on the scene the Attorney General who has filed an action in Allen Superior Court seeking to freeze the assets of the foundation and return them to Indiana:

“We believe that the merger was an illegal attempt to evade government oversight in Indiana,” Attorney General Steve Carter told The Journal Gazette.

The suit seeks to have the foundation’s assets returned to Indiana and to remove the foundation’s board members. Additional legal action was expected to be filed in Nevada.

 

Divorce, Federal style

Tuesday, December 20th, 2005

A new case from the Indiana Court of Appeals today (Glen Strohmier v. Vivian Strohmier) reflects on the dangers of modern divorce practice:  Husband and wife get a divorce.  Husband gets residence and is order to pay wife $30K for her share. Husband files bankruptcy, and strips out wife’s lien, and this discharges the obligation in bankruptcy.
 
In this case, the trial judge, seeing that wife got nothing and husband got everything, went back in and tried to make things fair.  The Court of Appeals said no, the trial court cannot change the property division after the fact.  Husband pursued his legal rights in bankruptcy court.  So the wife losses out.
 
Now, she could have entered the bankruptcy case and fought the discharge of the debt to her (maybe she did, I do not know), but having to do this lays a heavy burden on a recently divorced person, who likely has few cash resources and outstanding legal fees.
 
Add to this the fact that practice in federal courts in general and bankruptcy courts, specifically, has grown increasingly more complicated, and expensive, and it becomes very likely that the trip to bankruptcy court by one spouse will result in an unfair result for the other after a divorce.
 
A note.  I am traveling during the Christmas season, so I will wish all my readers a Merry Christmas at this point, although I might check in.  One thing I will do before I leave is close off the comments and the trackbacks on the blog.  I cannot leave this thing alone for more that a day without a ton of spam coming on.
 

Wayne County Commissioners Meet Tomorrow

Tuesday, December 20th, 2005

at 9:30 AM, and will hear:
Barbara Sha Cox, a Richmond resident interested in the effect of confined feeding operations on the environment, will give the commissioners an update on water quality in Wayne County.

Marshal County CAFO

Tuesday, December 20th, 2005

Are CAFO regulations coming to Marshall County? Maybe, but not before Mishawaka hog industrialist Matt Laidig has his 8,000-head farm proposal reviewed.  County commissioners heard from residents on the issue yesterday:
 
I don’t know of anything … that triggers an automatic public hearing,” Ralph Booker, county planning director, told the commissioners.

Booker pointed out that there is no ordinance for the county that would require such an operation to request a special exemption.

“Our ordinance says (the facility has to be) a quarter-mile (away from the nearest residence),” Booker said. “There’s no special exemption required for these types of operations.”

Marshall County officials have been discussing for more than two years now the upgrade of the 1974-issued county comprehensive plan. None of the existing ordinances specifically address confined feeding operations, he said.

Indiana Department of Environmental Management officials had notified neighbors of the proposed operation because IDEM is responsible for monitoring water. IDEM has declined to hold a public hearing on the matter, but is receiving public comment, the men said.

[Neighbor Dave] Williams argued that confined feeding operations, in general, have more in common with industrial than agricultural activities, and should be zoned as such.
. . . .
 
After considerable discussion, the commissioners voted unanimously to draft an ordinance requiring a livestock operation requiring an IDEM permit to have to seek a special exemption from the county, as well.
 

Jackson County - CAFO Debate Cited in Political Fight

Sunday, December 18th, 2005

Jackson County has reshuffled it Board of Zoning Appeals, and some are calling foul.  County council voted to replace one member with the former head of community group organized to oppose approval of an 8,000 head pig farm:
Council voted 4-3 Wednesday night to replace Councilwoman Debbie Hackman on the county plan commission with Councilman Richard Brackemyre, a former Redding Township trustee. Council also voted 5-2 to replace Gene Speaker of Hamilton Township as its representative on the county board of zoning appeals with Charlie Fox of Redding Township.
. . . .
Brackemyre said he opposes Talara Lykins’ 8,000-head hog farm planned in Redding Township, and Fox is a member of FAIR, a community grass-roots organization formed to oppose the Lykins farm. Fox was a primary speaker for FAIR earlier this fall when Lykins’ request came before the BZA. Speaker voted in support of that request, which was approved 3-1 after BZA members first deadlocked 2-2 during a meeting on Oct. 11.
 
Also out of Jackson county, a piece about the concerns facing the county over the legal fees involved in defending the county in lawsuits over zoning decisions, specifically, decision about the Lykins CAFO request: Link 
 
I think this points to a real concern for rural Indiana’s future: CAFO supporters choose locations where they feel regulation is weak, and money is tight. The hope being that the county will tire of the fight. They are in this sense, environmental carpetbaggers. Other states with poor rural areas are experiencing the same prospect: Other views: Don’t allow big hog feeder to water down CAFO Regulations.
 
Thanks to Bob for the pointers on the Jackson County stories.
 
 

Local CAFO Rules Approved

Thursday, December 15th, 2005

Bloggers Gather

Thursday, December 15th, 2005

While not as big as the meet-ups they have in New York or Chicago, Wayne County experienced a blogger gathering of its own today, thanks to Chris Hardie at Summersault, LLC who has his own weblog.  Today he hosted a TechTalk on blogging:
 
12-15-05_1207.jpg
 
In the room were at least four local bloggers: me, Chris, Mark Stosberg and Evan Agee.
 
You still have a chance to grab Chris’ show and talk, he is hosting another session tonight at 5:30 at the Uptown Innovation Center, 814 East Main Street in Richmond.
 

Snow Day Rules

Thursday, December 15th, 2005

Earlier today, someone asked me a question about the City of Richmond’s code of ordinances. This sent me to the “books” (now online, I had not noticed this before: http://www.ci.richmond.in.us/law/rcc.html). While there, I found the following rules that folks should keep in mind during today’s snowy festivities:
 

130.06 THROWING STONES

(a) No person shall throw any stone, snowball or any other missile upon or at any vehicle, building, tree or other public or private property or upon or at any person in any public or private way or place or enclosed or unenclosed ground, nor injure or frighten any bird or birds within the city, or throw any stones or other missiles where they might injure any person or property.

(b) It shall be a defense to Sections 130.01 (a) and 130.06(a) in a situation involving snowballs if the thrower and the designated target of a snowball have consented to or have mutually engaged in the throwing of snowballs. No snowballs shall, in any event, contain stones or other hard objects within them.

I like the fact that the city fathers decided it should be against the law to frighten birds, but I wonder how you can “mutually engage” in a snowball fight: someone has to throw the first ball.

 

Huh? New Castle?

Thursday, December 15th, 2005
Newslink Indiana noted yesterday that the US EPA recently rated sparsely populated Henry County with the 6th most polluted air:
Local officials are confused about the results. A spokesman for the Environmental Health Department in New Castle said he didn’t want to comment until his request to the Indiana Department of Environmental Management for an explanation is answered.

Mayor Tom Nipp was also unavailable for comment.

The industry named for releasing the highest amount of toxic emissions is Allegheny Ludlum. Managers of Allegheny also weren’t able to comment.

I could not find the report, but I would like to see what they are talking about.

Something in the Water

Wednesday, December 14th, 2005

CAFO has local officials concerned about the Medora town water supply:
Town officials remain fearful a large-scale hog operation planned in Owen Township could harm their public water supply.

“I wrote a letter to (the Indiana Department of Environmental Management) about the hog farm operation and our objections,” Melvin Hunsucker said during a meeting of the town council Monday night at the Medora Library. Hunsucker operates the town’s water and sanitary sewer systems.

Hog manure worries Medora officials - Seymour Daily Tribune

The article quotes the town council president as being concerned about the town having to foot the bill for enhanced water treatment systems if ammonia and nitrates enter the water system.
 
 
 
 
 

Agra Education

Wednesday, December 14th, 2005

Head over to the Big Eastern today. Marty is taking us to school on the CAFO issue.  He starts with some basic vocabulary:
Think of the agronomic rate as the number of units of manure per acre per year above which no additional crop yield would be achieved. See: 327 IAC 16-10-1, 2. . . .
 
Application rates exceeding the agronomic rate can be described as a ‘disposal rate’ — that means dumping more manure on the land than the plants can use. For a cautionary tale, consider the unfortunate and unwise history of chronic overloading of manure to sandy regions in the Netherlands.

Jasper County CAFO

Tuesday, December 13th, 2005

Marcia Oddi has the latest on coverage of the pig CAFO vs. Sandhill crane area issue: here.
 

Strike One: Ohio’s definition of Marriage Amendment Ruling

Tuesday, December 13th, 2005

Ohio’s constitutional amendment defining marriage is one of the most stringent in the nation, prohibiting the passage of laws in the state that give “marriage rights” to unmarried couples, like same-sex unions.
 
Some creative attorneys in the criminal field decided to try to use the newly enacted amendment to invalidate domestic violence charges brought in a physical dispute between unmarried couples. Several appeals are pending, but the first is now out, and the results uphold the application of the domestic battery statute for unmarried couples.

The appeals court said simply that the Ohio Defense of Marriage Act and the domestic violence law were intended to address different issues and they do not cancel each other out.

“The intent of the domestic violence statute is clear on its face: to protect all members of a household from domestic violence by punishing those who commit domestic violence,” Justices H.J. Bressler and William W. Young wrote.

Domestic violence law upheld: Cincinnati Enquirer

CAFO Break? Nope, no rest in this State

Sunday, December 11th, 2005

Lots of news recently in Indiana/CAFO land:

Suits under review - Seymour Daily Tribune:

Jackson County Board of Zoning Appeals will meet in executive session at 7 p.m. Tuesday at the courthouse annex in Brownstown to discuss litigation.

The board will discuss three lawsuits. Executive sessions are closed to the public and press. The first concerns a decision it made in November 2004 to allow Rumpke of Indiana to expand its Medora landfill. That suit was filed by Douglas B. Young and James R. Ault. A decision by Brown Circuit Court Judge Judith Stewart is pending. Stewart agreed to serve as a special judge in the case after Jackson Circuit Court Judge Bill Vance stepped down because of a conflict of interest involving one of Ault’s relatives who works in his office.

The other two lawsuits involve a BZA decision in October to allow an 8,000-hog confined feeding operation on a 10-acre tract near Reddington. They were brought by Jennings Water Inc. and a group of area residents. Both question how the vote to approve the confined feeding operation request was conducted.

The BZA will meet at 7:30 p.m. in public session. The only agenda item is a request from Gary Lemon, 3702 E. 900N, Seymour, for a variance to operate a business from his home. It would involve selling advertising part time.

 

Under heightened security and in opposition to 150 protesters, the Jasper County Board of Zoning Appeals approved a special exception on Monday night for T & M Limited Partnership to operate a Confined Animal Feeding Operation (CAFO) for 4,000 cows in Barkley Township.

In anticipation of a boisterous and unruly crowd, arrangements were made to have three sheriff’s deputies stand guard for the four-hour public hearing.

“How many of these mega-dairies do we need?” asked Jasper County resident Diane Richardson. “We (Jasper County) are developing a reputation for allowing any confined feeding operation at all, but the concentration of so many in such a small area is bound to backfire.”

 

Their request was unanimously denied by the board Wednesday night. The Lehmans, however, still plan to raise ducks for human consumption.

Although the Lehmans have ample land where they could put the building – which will house up to 11,000 ducks for six weeks at a time – the variance they requested would have put the building closer to their home and made chores more convenient, Ernest Lehman said during the meeting.

Several neighbors of the farm spoke out against the variance application Wednesday.

Many of those, such as Marsha Woorell, whose property sits downhill from the Lehmans, said she already gets significant runoff during heavy rain that turns her backyard into a pond. She expressed concern Wednesday about how the manure from the ducks will be contained.

Marcia Oddi had coverage on this one here: December 9, 2005 12:26 PM, and be sure to look back to December 7th on her site and find her coverage of the Jasper County CAFO issue: Link. I talked about this CAFO before, and pointed out Jasper County resident Karen Myers’s view on this issue.
 
Outside of Indiana, check out:
 
 
 

We’re # 2!!!

Sunday, December 11th, 2005

Not good. The Pal Item reports today on Indiana’s place in the US Methamphetamine manufacturing ranking. We are the number 2 state, behind Missouri, in discovered meth labs.
 
My guess? The main ingredient, anhydrous ammonia, is plentiful in farming states like Indiana, so, since we can make it here, we do. 
 
The Pal item touches on the meth problem from the environmental perspective, noting that IDEM is to come out with meth lab clean up protocols in the near future.  The processing of meth creates some problematic chemicals (what, I’m not sure), but the real problem is that the labs are run by folks who are not real concerned with (or even aware of)  the dangerous side effects of the manufacturing process.  The result is, these places are nasty and dangerous.
 
The article does not touch on the other main side effect of meth production: meth use, and the destruction of individuals and families that results, but it does note that meth users have a funny smell.
 
The article notes that the Midwest’s governors will be meeting soon, and predicts that the conference will be used to pressure Ohio Gov Taft to get on board with the regulation of the sale of over-the-counter cold remedies, another meth manufacturing need.  Most states have taken steps to limit access to these remedies, but Ohio still does not.
 
 
The cold remedy issue reminds me that one of my new favorite cartoon, Mike Belkin’s Unfit, recently covered this issue:
 
http://www.kemplog.com/images/unfit.jpg
 

  • Photos

    Spring has sprung at home (iPhoneSlide)

    Last meal on the trip (iPhoneSlide)

    Bathroom break #1 (iPhoneSlide)

    More Photos
  • Loading...
  • New Links of Interest