<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Alternatives for CAFO Waste Studied, Found Expensive</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kemplog.com/2006/03/14/alternatives-for-cafo-waste-studied-found-expensive/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kemplog.com/2006/03/14/alternatives-for-cafo-waste-studied-found-expensive/</link>
	<description>Life and law in Eastern Indiana</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 08:19:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://www.kemplog.com/2006/03/14/alternatives-for-cafo-waste-studied-found-expensive/#comment-198</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2006 17:22:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kemplog.com/2006/03/14/alternatives-for-cafo-waste-studied-found-expensive/#comment-198</guid>
		<description>I'm guessing the studies didn't include the externalized costs of stench, health problems, and the like when considering how much each alternative actually cost.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m guessing the studies didn&#8217;t include the externalized costs of stench, health problems, and the like when considering how much each alternative actually cost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
