home

Archive for May, 2006

Another Day, Another Resident Speaks Out About CAFO’s

Monday, May 29th, 2006

Well, Randolph County residents are taking note of the max influx of CAFO’s into their region. Today, Winchester resident Jette Dungan give us some facts on property values around CAFO’s:
 
A 1997 study of 237 rural homes in North Carolina found a decline of up to 9 percent in property values. In a study done by Iowa State University in 2003 of 1,145 rural homes in five north-central Iowa counties from 1992 to 2002, economists reported that property values plunged by up to 11 percent for homes located within a quarter mile of a CAFO (Confined Animal Feeding Operation). Homes within a half mile of a CAFO dropped in value by up to 8 percent. Property values dipped about 3 percent for homes that were located more than a mile from a CAFO.
 
In April 2000, a new report by University of Missouri Extension has found staggering land devaluation near the county’s CAFOs. Bottom line: $2.68 million in loss of land value for the county and 99 property owners located within three miles of CAFOs or an average of $112 per acre.

The issues surrounding CAFOs largely rest on individual property rights and equity when long-term residents experience a decrease in property values. Questions as to what legal recourses are available to communities and to property owners arise.

Residents Continue to Raise Concerns with the New CAFO State

Sunday, May 28th, 2006

Richmond resident Jan Wright has a letter to the editor of the Pal-Item Today. I think it is a good summary of the tradeoffs these operations present to a community:
 

On April 2, 2006, the Pal-Item ran a big article on the hog operation that is coming to Wayne County near Williamsburg. On the surface it looks as if this is a good deal for Wayne County: new jobs, good outlet for grain production. But wait a minute. Let’s look at the downside, too.

I’m sure that most of us have driven by family farms of 200 or 300 hogs. Notice the aroma? One can only speculate about the stench that will be created by 15,000 brood sows. Animals draw flies. I have read that homes in the area of these CAFO operations are covered with flies. Their yards are unusable in the summertime and the ammonia fumes cause a most unpleasant burning in your eyes. What about the folks whose farms and homes are within a three-mile area ? How about their property values? Good deal ?

The P-I article states that the CAFO will be shipping 4,800 piglets a week to grow-to-finish hog operations. How many trucks will that take? How many trucks will be needed to bring in supplies? What will happen to the roads with that much traffic? Who will pay for the repairs? My bet is that it will be your tax dollars. Good deal?

The amount of manure that will be created by this many animals is almost inconceivable. The article stated that the manure would be held for a year and then drilled into the soil. There is also to be a holding pond for runoff. These ponds are notorious for malfunctions. The runoff goes into streams and kills fish and other wildlife. CAFOs also draw enormous amounts of water. What happens when nearby wells go dry? What happens if our precious non-replicable water supply is and possibly will be polluted? Good deal?

Something New in the Milk

Saturday, May 27th, 2006

Natural farmer David Haxton MacRaven of has a post up yesterday about a new development in the dairy field: cows that are genetically re-engineered to produce their own antibiotics:
[M]astitis has gotten out of hand because we feed massive doses of sub therapeutic antibiotics to our cows. To solve the problem we’re going to genetically engineer the cow to produce it’s own antibiotics.

To which the bacteria that cause mastitis will never gain resistance, I’m sure.

link.

First Iowa, Now Wisconsin?

Friday, May 26th, 2006

Earlier this week, I commented on Iowa’s consideration of rules limiting manure spreading by CAFO’s. Now Brownfields is reporting that Wisconsin is also considering stepping up CAFO regulations:
 
The Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (DNR) board approved new manure management rules this week. The changes would mainly affect Confined Animal Feeding Operations (CAFOs), operations with 1,000 or more animal units. The new rules would require these operations to have at least six months storage capacity for liquid manure and the ability to inject liquid manure during certain months. There would be a ban on spreading solid manure on snow-covered or frozen ground during February and March unless it is immediately worked into the soil. The proposal also has required set-backs from wells; sinkholes and fractured bedrock, there are phosphorus-based nutrient management plan standards as well as a need for an emergency response plan in case of a spill.
 
The proposed rules go to Wisconsin legislators next, where CAFO interests hope to be able to have an impact
 

Randolph County Stink gets Notice of National Group

Thursday, May 25th, 2006
The Center for Rural Affairs, a nonprofit focusing on issues that impact the quality of life in rural areas and the plight of small family farming operations has picked up on the trend of mega corporate hog operations migrating to areas of the country with the fewest protection for local citizens, focusing on the situation in Randolph County: coverage:
Local residents have expressed concern that Indiana is encouraging corporate hog operations to move from North Carolina, where state policies have curtailed the dramatic expansion of corporate hog production in North Carolina that occurred in the 1990’s.

Randolph County’s planning commission has voted against several CAFO ordinances. But local concerned citizens believe that the tide may be turning in favor of endorsing regulations for hog farms, due to the recent dramatic influx of hog operations.

“Before, the only thing the plan commission could see was the [first] dairy…what came to light…is a much bigger scheme,” said Randolph County resident Robbie Davis.

Midwives vs. State

Wednesday, May 24th, 2006

Jennifer Williams, a Bloomington based midwife facing criminal charges in Shelby County connection with the death of a child she delivered is now suing the State of Indiana.
 
Ms. Williams is unlicensed. Indiana requires midwives to be RN’s and have special training. Ms. Williams’s attorney Michael Ausbrook (of the blog INcourts) says the law is not clear:
 
“The law is a mess,” Williams’ attorney, Michael Ausbrook, told The Herald-Times for a story Tuesday. “Because of the mess, we’re not claiming we know exactly what it is, but we’re pretty sure what it’s not.”
Link (News-Sentinel).
 
The lawsuit reportedly seeks to get a court ruling on whether a license is required to serve as a midwife.
 
I would like to see how Mr. Ausbrook is structuring his argument. There is a statute out these for licensing (IC 25-23-1-13.1). The legislature has chosen to make the practice of midwifery without a license a class D felony (IC 25-22.5-8-2) and at least one decision from the Indiana Court of Appeals holding that midwifery constitutes the practice of medicine and is subject to sanction if unlicensed. (Smith v. State ex rel. Medical Licensing Bd., 459 N.E.2d 401 (Ind. App. 1984)).
 

Randolph County Vents

Tuesday, May 23rd, 2006

Things are heating up in Randolph County. Check the local opinion on the StarPress forum:  CAFO.
 
One Lynn resident has her opinion up in the Pal-Item today.
 
Lots of anger floating to the surface over the mass influx of hogs in Randolph County. . . .
 
 

Manure Limits? In Iowa? No Way

Monday, May 22nd, 2006

From the Ag industry’s news source:
 
Iowa’s Environmental Protection Commission is considering banning the use of livestock manure as fertilizer on soybean fields. A proposal is currently being considered by state regulators to put the ban in place.

Commissioners and state officials supporting the regulation argue that manure is not needed for soybean growth and that it actually has the potential to cause harm to the environment. State officials says that research shows manure applied annually on soybean and corn crop rotations applies 61 percent more phosphorus than needed for the crops to grow.

Iowa Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRS) Nutrient Specialist Steve Brinkman explains that the Department of Natural Resources is concerned about excess manure running into the surface water.
Link (Brownfields)
 
Apparently the issue is excess nitrogen. The environmental folks note that soybeans fix their own nitrogen, so application of manure results in excess nitrogen, which ends up in the water. About 1/2 of the manure management plans in Iowa involve putting manure on soybeans.
 

Early Morning CAFO Saturday

Saturday, May 20th, 2006

In Grant County, in response to the request by the county commissioners, the pal commission has set a meeting:
 
At the regular Grant County Area Plan Commission meeting June 5, the board will be presented with recommendations for changes in the treatment of CAFOs from county officials.
 
They’ll also hear public comment, which has been plentiful in an ongoing debate over the building of a 2,200 cow dairy southwest of Van Buren.
Link (The Area Plan Commission meeting is scheduled for 7 p.m., June 5 at the Willis Van Devanter Grant County Office Complex, 401 S. Adams St.)
 
In Madison County, an 8,000 hog CAFO headed for  land near Elwood is headed to hearing on a special use exception before the Board of zoning appeals. One resident, Cathy Goins, is raising concerns:
 
Both of these waterways flow through the town of Elwood, through the parks and through the school grounds. There are signs posted along both of these creeks warning of possible contamination, especially during heavy rain and flooding. We have all seen how Duck Creek can flood specifically behind Edgewood Elementary School. Does this community want to see even more potential pollutants flowing through our community?
Link (Hey check out the Muncie Free Press - a new journalistic effort out of Muncie)
 
Some links I have not posted recently providing coverage of factory farming and the food chain in general: Some good organizations like the Cornucopia Institute & Grace Factory Farming; good blogs like the Accidental Hedonist, the Sustainable Table and US Food Policy Blog. Indiana focus from Bigeastern, WAHM Diary, and of course the unparalleled Indiana Law Blog.
 
 

Randolph County: CAFO Central

Thursday, May 18th, 2006

Tuesday night, the Randolph County plan commission heard petitions by a local citizen’s group (Environmentally Concerned Citizens of Randolph County) seeking a moratorium on CAFO’s.  10 new CAFO’s a slated for the county, bringing in 80,000 new pigs.  The plan commission took no action, but did form a committee to hear concerns and make recommendations back to the commission:
 

Chairman Mike Wickersham, who favors the establishment of restrictions on CAFOs, will appoint members representing both sides of the issue to a joint committee. The so-far unnamed committee will include representatives of the livestock industry, the planning commission and those concerned about the environmental repercussions of these farms.

That group could follow a path proposed by Clyde Shaffer Jr., a pork producer, and Wendy Carpenter, a member of ECCRC. They laid out a proposal that includes the creation of a group that would visit each proposed CAFO site in the county and make a recommendation about each site.

Cathy Flatter, executive director of the planning commission said the fact that Shaffer and Carpenter have come up with a plan is “a major breakthrough.”

Link (Article by Joy Leiker at the Star Press).

 

You can also view coverage of the new CAFO committee on Kicks96 Video News.

 

More on Local Water

Wednesday, May 17th, 2006

A couple dozen residents showed up to speak with Alice Rubin from IDEM about the local watershed yesterday. More from the Pal-Item today: IDEM looking at E. coli levels
 
The watershed has three confined livestock feeding operations, but there have been no reported violations from those farms, Rubin said. Smaller livestock herds not large enough to meet confined feeding operation permit requirements may contribute to the contamination, she said.

Richmond’s wastewater treatment plant discharges into the river, as does Brookville’s plant and the one at Wayne County’s Cloverleaf Mobile Home Park. Liberty’s wastewater treatment plant discharges into Silver Creek, which is also one of the impaired streams.

Richmond has four combined sanitary and storm water sewer outfalls that overflow during heavy rains, resulting in warnings of contamination of the river. There are three sanitary sewer overflows.

The paper also posts a map of the watershed. Of course, the local watershed shown is only part of the story. The trouble with water is it all runs downhill, so no matter how hard you try to clean up your own pollution sources, you still can get dirty water from those above you.

 

Now, Let’s Talk

Tuesday, May 16th, 2006

Heads up, The Pal Item is moving to a morning/multiple times through the day format. As a result, we have news from the paper today that IDEM wants to hear from local residents about developing a plan to deal with the polluted watershed:
 

Residents of Wayne, Union, Franklin and Fayette counties can help the Indiana Department of Environmental Management begin to develop a plan tonight to improve water quality in the watershed of the Whitewater River’s East Fork.

The informational meeting is at 6 p.m. today at the Richmond city council chambers, 50 N. Fifth St.

Water samples taken from multiple locations in the east fork’s watershed show levels of E.coli bacteria are above those allowed under state and federal water quality standards. When water quality is poor, the federal Clean Water Act requires IDEM to set quality goals through a Total Maximum Daily Load plan.

Affected water bodies are Wayne County’s Lick and Elkhorn creeks, Union County’s Silver, Hanna and Dubois creeks, the middle, west and upper east forks and the east fork Whitewater River.

IDEM routinely tests creeks and rivers for impairment. Activities that affect water quality are discharges from municipal or industrial wastewater treatment plants, run-off from paved surfaces, construction sites and farmland. Failing septic systems also affect water quality.

Citizens with questions may contact Alice Rubin, (800) 451-6027 or by e-mail at arubin@idem.In.gov.

Link.

Editorial: Go Slow on CAFO Development

Monday, May 15th, 2006

The Grant County Chronicle-Tribune has an editorial up today following last week’s dust up at the Grant County commissioners’ meeting, leading to a recommendation from the commissioners that the plan commission study the CAFO issue before moving forward. The editorial tries to strike the middle ground between pro & anti-CAFO advocates, and support’s the commissioner’s recommendation:
 

Some state and local governments, including, most recently, North Carolina, have enacted moratoriums on CAFOs. North Carolina’s moratorium is on swine operations and, according to news reports, is because of CAFOs’ adverse environmental effects in the state.

That’s not likely to happen in Indiana, but we still do not have to rush into things, and local governments deserve support from state agencies, such as the Indiana Department of Environmental Management, in working through these decisions.

Because of the magnitude of the operations, county governments are more than likely unprepared for the planning, zoning, siting and enforcement issues, so they must rely on IDEM’s resources and expertise to protect citizens’ interests.

Grant County officials are doing the right thing by moving with deliberate speed, and IDEM should offer its advice and support during the process. The state obviously has an interest in promoting the growth of agriculture, but it also has an interest in protecting the state’s environment.

 

Link.

 

Jay County Ready to Act

Friday, May 12th, 2006

Thanks to a helpful reader, news that Jay County is ready to move forward on CAFO regulations:
 
Members of the Jay County Council have decided it’s time for Jay County Commissioners to more closely regulate confined feeding operations in the county.

And recommendations from a comprehensive study of CFOs completed last year seem to be the place to start, council members said Wednesday.

“Commissioners gotta pick this up and run with it,” council member Gerald Kirby said during the council’s monthly meeting.

Several residents of Noble Township who have spoken to commissioners the past two weeks expressing concern about a proposed confined feeding operation in the works to be located on county road 50 North, addressed county council members Wednesday night.
 
The commissioners, confronted with residents concerned about property values, manure seepage, water contamination, and lack of information about pending operation, decided that now is the time to do something with the results of a comprehensive study on the impact of CAFO’s in Jay County completed last year, but never acted on:
 
Recommendations of the committee included more local requirements at the start-up of confined feeding operations, local citations for environmental violations, a manure land-use database and a manure management ordinance, and requiring those who purchase or build residential properties in rural areas to read and sign a copy of the Indiana Right to Farm law.
One Commissioner recommended passage of the regulations as a way to avoid a riot as residents spoke out in relation to the passage of a tax abatement:
The meeting’s sometimes heated discussion began when Bob Quadrozzi, executive director of Jay County Development Corporation, presented a recommendation from the Jay County Tax Abatement Advisory Committee to grant a three-year abatement to Rick Dues, 3742 South 300 East. Dues is planning to construct a 92-foot by 154-foot 4,000-head nursery hog operation and is asking the abatement, or phase-in of new taxes, for the buildings, valued at $400,000
Although the residents were concerned, Mr. Quadrozzi assured them that the state Department of Agriculture will be hosting a series of meetings around the state to hear residents concerns with the governor’s plan to double pork production in the state.  I know Mr. Quadrozzi does not speak for Any Miller, but his comment make me wonder if Mr. Miller actually said he would be hosting discussions on the plan at the meeting in Winchester on Monday.
 
I wonder how many new CAFO will be in operation before Mr. Miller comes to hear our concerns.
 
Read all about it: Council: Act now on livestock farms (The Jay County Commercial Review)

Murder? But he didn’t kill anyone

Friday, May 12th, 2006

A man who police said waited in a car while an accomplice allegedly robbed a pharmacy faces a murder charge in his partner’s death under a seldom-used Indiana law.
So reads the lead sentence of the Indy Star story up today on Wayne County’s recent CVS robbery gone wrong. AJ Potter allegedly was in the process of tapping into the OxyContin supply at the Cambridge City CVS when he was confronted by 2 local police officers. The officers say they opened fire when Potter pulled a gun. Potter was killed after being hit 7 times.
 
Potter’s friend/associate/ride?, Tucker Hunt, was in a car outside the store, and the state is accusing him of being the getaway driver, and hence, involved in the robbery.
 
The “seldom used law” mentioned in the Star article is the second subsection of Indiana’s murder statute, IC 35-42-1-1. This paragraph defines murder as being where a person “kills another human being while committing or attempting to commit . . . robbery.”
 
Many local folks are upset that Hunt got charged with murder as: (1) he did not kill anyone, (2) he did not intend for anyone to be killed, (3) the police were the ones who actually killed Potter. To get a sense of this local sentiment, check out the Pal-Item’s forum: Man gets charged with murder for a life he didn’t take.
 
Wayne County prosecutor, Michael Shipman is quoted in the Star article explaining the charge:
Indiana law says that if a defendant engages in a felony crime and a person gets killed in the commission of that crime, then the defendant can be charged for murder.
I think Mike is right on the law, and despite what folks may think, I bet the legislature intended for accomplices to be subject to a murder charge if the serious crime being undertaken goes wrong, and someone gets killed, even the gunman himself. I do not know the statistics, but I wonder where the Star got the idea that this was a seldom used law.
 
 
 

Jackson County Pig CAFO dispute continues

Wednesday, May 10th, 2006

Up in Jackson county, the opposition to the installation of a 8,000 head hog operation have continued. IDEM granted the permit for Talara Lykins’ operation, and back in October of 2005, the Jackson County Board of Zoning Appeals granted the request for a special exception. That would normally be the last hurtle before getting the building permits and breaking ground.
 
However, an active citizens group and a concerned water company have continued to fight the placement of the operation. There is litigation pending against the BZA for issuing the special exception, and the IDEM permit is being appealed. There will be a hearing at the Office of Environmental Adjudication on that appeal starting tomorrow.
 
The main complaint about the approvals is the site location, which many, including the Jennings County Water Corporation feel is not appropriate for a CAFO.  The site is made up of “zipp” soil, which is very heavy with clay, and common in low lying areas. There is also concern that the water table at the site is just below the surface. Your may remember this picture, taken to demonstrate the site’s water issues:
 
http://www.kemplog.com/images/Jackson_Deep_Water.png
 
Previously:
 
 
 
 
 

WE’RE SAVED

Wednesday, May 10th, 2006

The Muncie Star Press has a piece up about the big news Andy Miller, head of the Indiana State Department of Agriculture, brought to East Central Indiana:
 
“You’ve seen our strategic plan and know where we see opportunities for the state,” Miller told about 100 people who gathered on the courthouse lawn for the announcement.
 Now the state wants to help Blackford, Delaware, Henry, Jay, Randolph, Wayne, Fayette, Union and Rush counties create local and regional strategies.
 
Now the state wants to help Blackford, Delaware, Henry, Jay, Randolph, Wayne, Fayette, Union and Rush counties create local and regional strategies.
And what does the Director have in mind for us poor folk in East Central Indiana:
 
“There is a tremendous amount of new opportunity knocking at your door,” Miller told the audience. “Whether that’s new bio-energy plants, whether that’s new food-processing facilities, whether that’s new hardwood opportunities, whether that’s new livestock opportunities, there is a tremendous amount of interest in East Central Indiana … for growth.”
(Okay, emphasis added). I found it interesting that Mr. Miller’s accompaniment for the announcement, Jim Riggle, spokesman for Indiana Michigan Power, outlined the problem as loss of population due to loss of jobs. I found the comments of a local business owner telling on this point:

Gary Moore, co-owner of the Chocolate Moose restaurant in Farmland, attended the announcement out of curiosity.

“Everybody who has a business depends on people living here instead of moving away,” Moore said in an interview. “We need to keep them here and have them move back.”

Would you relocate to Randolph County because of the rapid growth in confined hog farming? Does that sound like an appealing environment to raise your family?

 

Grant County Residents Crowd Commissioners Meeting: Think Twice About CAFO

Wednesday, May 10th, 2006

Tuesday’s Grant County Commissioners meeting was swamped by residents concerned about the 2,200 head dairy operation headed or Van Buren. While representatives for the dairy sought to reassure the commissioners that everything was being done properly, commissioners questioned why they had not heard from the dairy promoters before the filing of the permit request with IDEM.
 
As the area where the dairy is going in is zoned for CAFO’s, the dairy does not legally need to seek any approval from the county until they get the permit from IDEM, and need to get a building permit. There is little the plan office can do but grant a proper application for a building permit, so the commissioners passed a resolution asking the area plan commission review local policy on CAFO’s, specifically, to consider requiring CAFO seek a special exception from the board of zoning appeals.
 
The commissioners also requested that the plan office refrain from issuing building permits for CAFO’s until the review of local policy is complete.
 
Read all about it: Link (Grant County Chronicle- Tribune).

CAFO Info: Grant & Randolph Counties

Tuesday, May 9th, 2006

Friesian Meadows Dairy, LLC filed an application with IDEM on April 4, 2006, to open a 2,200 head dairy operations in Grant County. This is a Vreba-Hoff Dairy, and will be situated west of Van Buren. Of course, this has the neighbors concerned: 
“We’ve lived out here for 15 years, and we’ve invested a lot of time and money in our home to make it nice and to be able to spend time outside. We’ve got woods, and we go mushroom hunting - it’s just country living, you know?” said Kim Marshall, who lives close to the proposed site near Grant County roads 300 North and 800 East. “There’s a possibility that this could cause us not to be able to enjoy our home outside.”
Of course, the dairy’s promoters claim there is no need to be concerned as they will be abiding by state environmental standards. And, of course, Grant County does not have any local CAFO regulations, so once the dairy gets its NPDES permit from IDEM, the county’s only role will be issuing the building permit. The set back in Grant county is 500 feet from residences and 1,000 feet from schools: far too close to be outside of a CAFO’s air and water “impact zone.” (see Race, Poverty, and Potential Exposure of Middle-School Students to Air Emissions from Confined Swine Feeding Operations, for instance).
 
Maybe the folks in Grant County should check out Grace Factory Farm’s Guide to Confronting a CAFO.
 
Read more about Grant County’s new dairy:  What’s all the stink? (Chronicle-Tribune).
 
Over in Randolph County, where there have been 8 new CAFO applications since the middle of March, folks are gathering for an informational meeting with the plan commission and IDEM representatives at the Beeson Park Club House, May 16, 2006 at 7:00 P.M.
 
Finally, although not strictly a CAFO issue, as CAFOs play such a big role in food production, I want to note that Eric Schlosser, author of Fast Food Nation: The Dark Side of the All-American Meal, has a new book out aimed at kids: Chew On This : Everything You Don’t Want to Know About Fast Food. In the book, Schlosser targets 9 to 15 year olds, presenting information, but not preaching. His goal is to foster intelligent eaters.

A Few Notes About Factory Farming

Friday, May 5th, 2006

No big news, but a collection of items of interest that have been occupying a tab in my browser over the last week:
 
Over in Carroll County, consideration is being given to an update of the county’s zoning code. The Code covers Confined Feeding Operations (CFO’s), but some feel that those regs, drawn up for smaller (like 300 head) operations, do not give the county adequate control over CAFO’s. But the issue generated some debate:

[Plan Commissioner Pete] Wagoner said changes were needed to give county zoning administrator Dale Huffer “guidance about how to proceed.” APC vice president and leader of the April 25 evening meeting in the absence of president Bob McCain, Wayne Chapman concurred with Wagoner. “If we had something in writing, it would make Dale[Huffer]’s job easier.” Wagoner said to rely on the Indiana Department of Environmental Management for local regulations was not advisable. “IDEM is not concerned with our infrastructure or development,” he commented.

However Flora resident Dave Lambert disagreed with Wagoner. He said IDEM looks at all aspects of construction for production purposes before issuing permits.  “They aren’t going to let you build something that will leak into the ground,” he said. He also did not agree there should be a differentiation made between small and large operations. Lambert said a reasonable setback is 750 feet. That number is 250 feet more than the current regulations demand.

“Hog production drives this county. Look at the taxes produced,” he stated. He urged commission members to explore the consequences of their actions before changing the requirements. Travis Flora of Bringhurst concurred with Lambert. He also said he thought IDEM did an adequate enforcement job.

Link. (Carroll County Comet)

Meanwhile, folks up in northern Wayne County and all of Randolph County are still upset about the new CAFO’s going into that region. One resident on a “traditional” farm wrote in a letter to the Pal-Item this week:

Hog factories are a short-run solution that will create more long-run problems.

We need to think far ahead because our very community is at stake. Our open spaces, clean air and clean water that we enjoy will not be here for our children and grandchildren.

Quality of life will deteriorate. Jobs just aren’t enough compensation for turning a community into a “dump.”

Comments of Mary Ellen Davis. State Senator Allen Paul’s victory in the Republican primary was confirmed this week. As noted by the Muncie Star Press, Paul has been a vocal critic of expanding CAFO operations in the state without putting more stringent requirements and enforcement into place. Paul only won his home county (Wayne) by 22 votes, but Randolph County, the site of many new and controversial CAFO’s, assured his victory.

Factory Farming in the organic dairy industry continues to generate debate. In March, the Cornucopia Institute issued a report ranking organic dairy producers based on several factors, most of which related to whether the milk was produced in confinement lots, or traditional grazing operations. Some are calling for a boycott of bogus organic milk brands and last month, Samuel Fromartz published his new book on this issue as well as others: Organic, Inc. : Natural Foods and How They Grew. Also of interest in the area of food production, you should check out Michael Pollan’s The Omnivore’s Dilemma : A Natural History of Four Meals.

Recently, the organic standards advisory board for the USDA held a symposium on toughening organic standards. The board is recommending that cows get at least 30% of their “dry intake” from grazing. As I’ve said before, current regulations only require that the cows have “access” to pasture, which turns out to be a gray enough standard to drive a CAFO through.

But the agriculture industry is gearing up to oppose laws aimed at restricting CAFO growth on both the national and local stage: AGRICULTURE SECTOR FORMS LOBBYING GROUP TO PUSH CAFO EXEMPTIONS is the lead off an Inside the EPA article (paid registration required):

The group has hired a lobbying firm headed by former House Appropriations Committee Chairman Robert Livingstone (R_LA) to lobby on its behalf. The industry recently formalized the coalition, which had previously existed in an informal sense, to “have Congress clarify its intent” with respect to the regulation of manure under Superfund and EPCRA, one industry source says. The source says the group is seeking congressional action on a bill Rep. Ralph Hall (R_TX) introduced that would exempt manure from emergency reporting requirements and from the definition of a hazardous substance under Superfund. The source also says the group is “exploring its options” in the Senate.

Among the group’s members are the American Farm Bureau Federation, National Cattleman’s Beef Association and other major agricultural groups representing pork, dairy, egg and other producers in the sector.

The industry source says the group decided to formalize its existence because it sought congressional action on the issue during the last session of Congress but was unsuccessful.

(Thanks toBarbara Cox for the lead on this information).

  • Photos

    Spring has sprung at home (iPhoneSlide)

    Last meal on the trip (iPhoneSlide)

    Bathroom break #1 (iPhoneSlide)

    More Photos
  • Loading...
  • New Links of Interest